-
Joining the Dots in India's Big-Ticket Mobile Phone SEP Litigation
-
by
Rohini Lakshané and Shweta Mohandas
—
published
Jun 30, 2019
—
last modified
Jul 06, 2019 01:42 AM
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
Rohini Lakshané and Shweta Mohandas have published their last update to this paper that chronicles mobile device SEP litigation in India. All developments in the lawsuits filed in the Delhi High Court and complaints made to the CCI that were published in reliable sources till 20 September 2018 are mentioned in this paper. The paper was an output under the Pervasive Technologies project.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Comments and Suggestions to the Draft Patent Manual March 2019
-
by
Achal Prabhala, Feroz Ali, Ramya Sheshadri, Roshan John and Anubha Sinha
—
published
Mar 21, 2019
—
last modified
Apr 05, 2019 02:15 AM
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
A coordinated civil society response to the consultation on the Patent Manual. CIS provided comments on patenting of computer related inventions.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
CIS' Submission on Statement of Working of Patents
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Apr 10, 2018
—
last modified
Apr 21, 2018 03:32 PM
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
The Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) made a submission to the Indian Patent Office on the issue of Statement of Working as per Form 27 under the Patents Act, 1970.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
CIS' Submission to DIPP and CGPDTM at meeting with IP Stakeholders
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Dec 13, 2017
—
last modified
Dec 13, 2017 02:31 PM
—
filed under:
DIPP,
Patents,
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies
The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks held a meeting with IP stakeholders on December 7, 2017, chaired by the Secretary, DIPP, to take suggestions on improving procedures and functioning of the Office. Anubha Sinha attended the meeting and requested the DIPP to improve compliance of uploading Form 27s by patentees and ensure proper enforcement of related provisions within the Indian Patent Act, 1970. Additionally, we sent a detailed submission to the Office, drawing from our recent research. Thanks to Rohini Lakshane and Aman Goyal for their inputs.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Patent Working Requirements and Complex Products: An Empirical Assessment of India's Form 27 Practice and Compliance
-
by
Rohini Lakshané
—
published
Jul 17, 2017
—
last modified
Oct 13, 2017 04:32 AM
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies
India requires every patentee to file an annual statement, also known as “Form 27”, describing the working of each of its issued Indian patents. If a patent is not locally worked within three years of its issuance, any person may request a compulsory license, and if the patent is not adequately worked within two years of the grant of such a compulsory license, it may be revoked. The research paper on Form 27 practices and compliance by patentees authored by Prof Jorge L. Contreras, University of Utah, and Rohini Lakshané, Centre for Internet and Society has been accepted for publication in the NYU Journal of Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Indian Patent Office updates Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions, yet again
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Jul 02, 2017
—
last modified
Jul 05, 2017 07:42 AM
—
filed under:
Indian Patents Act Section 3(k),
Patents,
Access to Knowledge,
Software Patents
By discarding a test brought into force last year, the updated Guidelines take no concrete position to help clarify the ambiguity around patentability of software inventions in India.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Workshop on Innovation, Economic Development and IP in India and China
-
by
Anubha Sinha and Rohini Lakshané
—
published
Sep 28, 2016
—
last modified
Oct 09, 2016 04:41 AM
—
filed under:
Peer Production,
Access to Knowledge,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Open Hardware,
Open Innovation,
Mobile Apps,
Patents
Anubha Sinha and Rohini Lakshané presented at the SMU-JINDAL-RENMIN Workshop on “Innovation, Economic Development, and IP in India and China,” co-organised by the Singapore Management University, O.P. Jindal Global University, and Renmin University of China, in Delhi during September 27-28, 2016. Amitabh Kant, Chief Executive Officer, NITI Aayog, delivered the inaugural address at the workshop.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
News & Media
-
“Made in India” Innovation Policy
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Sep 22, 2016
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
In this post they emphasize upon the need for data-driven IP policy making in India.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
News & Media
-
Methodology: Statements of Working (Form 27) of Indian Mobile Device Patents
-
by
Rohini Lakshané
—
published
Sep 14, 2016
—
last modified
Sep 10, 2017 03:19 PM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Patents,
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies
In India, if a patent is not locally worked within three years of its issuance, any person may request a compulsory license, and if the patent is not adequately worked within two years of the grant of such a compulsory license, it may be revoked. In order to provide the public with information about patent working, India requires every patentee to file an annual statement on “Form 27” describing the working of each of its issued Indian patents. We conducted the first comprehensive and systematic study of all Forms 27 filed with respect to mobile devices. We tried to empirically establish the extent to which patentees and licensees comply with the statutory requirement to declare information about the working of their patents.
Research assistance was provided by interns Anna Liz Thomas and Nayana Dasgupta.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Tweak the Make in India Recipe
-
by
Rohini Lakshané
—
published
Jun 04, 2016
—
filed under:
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
As an erstwhile journalist covering electronics technologies and IT a few years ago, I was privy to a litany of manufacturers' woes and their causes: Tangled tax laws and regulations, red tape, corruption, licence raj, unreliable infrastructure such as power and roads, and lack of skilled labour.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs