-
Comments on the RBI's Consultation Paper on Peer to Peer Lending
-
by
Sumandro Chattapadhyay
—
published
Jun 01, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 01, 2016 08:21 PM
—
filed under:
Privacy,
Reserve Bank of India,
Data Protection,
Research,
Network Economies,
P2P Lending,
Researchers at Work
The Reserve Bank of India published a Consultation Paper on Peer to Peer Lending on April 28, 2016, and invited comments from the public. CIS submitted the following response, authored by Elonnai Hickok, Pavishka Mittal, Sumandro Chattapadhyay, Vidushi Marda, and Vipul Kharbanda.
Located in
RAW
-
RBI Consultation Paper on P2P Lending: Data Security and Privacy Concerns
-
by
Vipul Kharbanda
—
published
May 31, 2016
—
last modified
Jun 01, 2016 11:41 AM
—
filed under:
Privacy,
Reserve Bank of India,
Data Protection,
Research,
Network Economies,
P2P Lending,
Researchers at Work
On April 28, 2016 the Reserve Bank of India published a consultation paper on P2P Lending and invited comments from the public on the same. The Paper discusses what P2P lending is, the various regulatory practices that govern P2P lending in different jurisdictions and lists our arguments for and against regulating P2P lending platforms.
Located in
RAW
-
The National Privacy Principles
-
by
Pooja Saxena and Amber Sinha
—
published
Mar 21, 2016
—
filed under:
Data Protection,
Privacy
In this infographic, we try to break down the National Privacy Principles developed by the Group of Experts on Privacy led by the Former Chief Justice A.P. Shah in 2012.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Contestations of Data, ECJ Safe Harbor Ruling and Lessons for India
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Oct 14, 2015
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Digital Economy,
Public Accountability,
Privacy,
Platform Responsibility,
Data Protection,
Accountability,
Digital Security,
Digital India,
Internet Governance
The European Court of Justice has invalidated a European Commission decision, which had previously concluded that the 'Safe Harbour Privacy Principles' provide adequate protections for European citizens’ privacy rights for the transfer of personal data between European Union and United States. The inadequacies of the framework is not news for the European Commission and action by ECJ has been a long time coming. The ruling raises important questions about how the claims of citizenship are being negotiated in the context of the internet, and how increasingly the contestations of personal data are being employed in the discourse.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Centre for Internet and Society joins the Dynamic Coalition for Platform Responsibility
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Sep 23, 2014
—
last modified
Oct 07, 2014 10:54 AM
—
filed under:
Human Rights,
Privacy,
Internet Governance Forum,
Data Protection,
Terms of Service,
Internet Governance,
Platform Responsibility,
Intermediary Liability
The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) has joined the multistakeholder cooperative engagement amidst stakeholders towards creating Due Diligence Recommendations for online platforms and Model Contractual Provisions to be enshrined in ToS. This blog provides a brief background of the role of dynamic coalitions within the IGF structure, establishes the need for the coalition and provides an update on the action plan and next steps for interested stakeholders.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Reading the Fine Script: Service Providers, Terms and Conditions and Consumer Rights
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Jul 02, 2014
—
last modified
Jul 04, 2014 06:31 AM
—
filed under:
Social Media,
Consumer Rights,
Google,
internet and society,
Privacy,
Transparency and Accountability,
Intermediary Liability,
Accountability,
Facebook,
Data Protection,
Policies,
Safety
This year, an increasing number of incidents, related to consumer rights and service providers, have come to light. This blog illustrates the facts of the cases, and discusses the main issues at stake, namely, the role and responsibilities of providers of platforms for user-created content with regard to consumer rights.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
WSIS+10 High Level Event: A Bird's Eye Report
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Jun 20, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 20, 2014 03:57 PM
—
filed under:
WSIS+10,
Privacy,
Cybersecurity,
Human Rights Online,
Surveillance,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Facebook,
Data Protection,
Multi-stakeholder,
ICANN,
Internet Access,
ITU,
Internet Studies,
E-Governance,
ICT
The WSIS+10 High Level was organised by the ITU and collaborative UN entities on June 9-13, 2014. It aimed to evaluate the progress on implementation of WSIS Outcomes from Geneva 2003 and Tunis 2005, and to envision a post-2015 Development Agenda. Geetha Hariharan attended the event on CIS' behalf.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Marco Civil da Internet: Brazil’s ‘Internet Constitution’
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Apr 03, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 19, 2014 10:38 AM
—
filed under:
Privacy,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Data Protection,
Net Neutrality,
Internet Governance
On March 25, 2014, Brazil's lower house of parliament passed bill no. 2126/2011, popularly known as Marco Civil da Internet. The Marco Civil is a charter of Internet user-rights and service provider responsibilities, committed to freedom of speech and expression, privacy, and accessibility and openness of the Internet. In this post, the author looks at the pros and cons of the bill.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Electoral Databases – Privacy and Security Concerns
-
by
Snehashish Ghosh
—
published
Jan 16, 2014
—
last modified
Jan 16, 2014 11:07 AM
—
filed under:
Digital Governance,
Privacy,
Cybersecurity,
Data Protection,
Internet Governance,
Safety,
Information Technology,
Cyber Security,
Security,
e-Governance,
Transparency, Politics,
E-Governance
In this blogpost, Snehashish Ghosh analyzes privacy and security concerns which have surfaced with the digitization, centralization and standardization of the electoral database and argues that even though the law provides the scope for protection of electoral databases, the State has not taken any steps to ensure its safety.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2010
—
last modified
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 AM
—
filed under:
Development,
Consumer Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Piracy,
Access to Medicine,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Data Protection,
FLOSS,
Technological Protection Measures,
Publications
Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
