<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">




    



<channel rdf:about="http://editors.cis-india.org/search_rss">
  <title>Centre for Internet and Society</title>
  <link>http://editors.cis-india.org</link>
  
  <description>
    
            These are the search results for the query, showing results 1 to 1.
        
  </description>
  
  
  
  
  <image rdf:resource="http://editors.cis-india.org/logo.png"/>

  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
            <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/brazil-passes-marco-civil-us-fcc-alters-stance-on-net-neutrality"/>
        
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>

</channel>


    <item rdf:about="http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/brazil-passes-marco-civil-us-fcc-alters-stance-on-net-neutrality">
    <title>Brazil passes Marco Civil; the US-FCC Alters its Stance on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link>http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/brazil-passes-marco-civil-us-fcc-alters-stance-on-net-neutrality</link>
    <description>
        &lt;b&gt;Hopes for the Internet rise and fall rapidly. Yesterday, on April 23, 2014, Marco Civil da Internet, the Brazilian Bill of Internet rights, was passed by the Brazilian Senate into law. &lt;/b&gt;
        &lt;p style="text-align: justify; "&gt;&lt;i&gt;Marco Civil&lt;/i&gt;, on which we &lt;a href="http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/marco-civil-da-internet"&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; previously, includes provisions for the protection of privacy and freedom of expression of all users, rules mandating net neutrality, etc. Brazil celebrated the beginning of NETmundial, a momentous first day about which Achal Prabhala &lt;a href="http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/net-mundial-day-0"&gt;blogs&lt;/a&gt;, with President Rousseff’s approval of the&lt;i&gt; Marco Civil&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify; "&gt;At about the same time, news &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/568be7f6-cb2f-11e3-ba95-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2zmtOMMj0"&gt;broke&lt;/a&gt; that the US Federal Communications Commission is set to propose new net neutrality rules. In the wake of the &lt;a href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/14/net-neutrality-internet-fcc-verizon-court"&gt;Verizon net neutrality decision&lt;/a&gt; in January, the proposed new rules will &lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2147520/report-us-fcc-to-allow-payments-for-speedier-traffic.html"&gt;prohibit&lt;/a&gt; Internet service providers such as Comcast from slowing down or blocking traffic to certain websites, but permit fast lane traffic for content providers who are willing to pay for it. This fast lane would prioritise traffic from content providers like Netflix and Youtube on commercially reasonable terms, and result in availability of video and other content at higher speeds or quality. An interesting turn-around, as &lt;i&gt;Marco Civil&lt;/i&gt; expressly mandates net neutrality for all traffic.&lt;/p&gt;
        &lt;p&gt;
        For more details visit &lt;a href='http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/brazil-passes-marco-civil-us-fcc-alters-stance-on-net-neutrality'&gt;http://editors.cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/brazil-passes-marco-civil-us-fcc-alters-stance-on-net-neutrality&lt;/a&gt;
        &lt;/p&gt;
    </description>
    <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
    <dc:creator>geetha</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights></dc:rights>

    
        <dc:subject>IANA</dc:subject>
    
    
        <dc:subject>Internet Governance</dc:subject>
    
    
        <dc:subject>NETmundial</dc:subject>
    
    
        <dc:subject>ICANN</dc:subject>
    
    
        <dc:subject>Marco Civil</dc:subject>
    

   <dc:date>2014-04-24T10:05:32Z</dc:date>
   <dc:type>Blog Entry</dc:type>
   </item>




</rdf:RDF>
