-
ICANN’s Problems with Accountability and the .WEB Controversy
-
by
Padma Venkataraman
—
published
Oct 24, 2017
—
last modified
Oct 28, 2017 03:49 PM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Transparency,
Internet Governance,
Accountability
The Post-Transition IANA promised enhanced transparency and accountability to the global multistakeholder community. The series of events surrounding the .WEB auction earlier this year has stirred up issues relating to the lack of transparency and accountability of ICANN. This post examines the .WEB auction as a case study to better understand exact gaps in accountability.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Comments from the Centre for Internet and Society on Renewal of .NET Registry Agreement
-
by
Vidushi Marda
—
published
May 31, 2017
—
last modified
Jun 06, 2017 01:35 PM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
The Centre for Internet and Society (CIS) is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the proposed renewal of the .NET Registry Agreement.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
CIS representation at ICANN 58
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 28, 2017
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) organized ICANN 58 at Copenhagen from March 9 to March 16, 2017. On behalf of the Centre for Internet & Society (CIS), Vidushi Marda participated in the event and made a presentation.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
Comments on the Proposed ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy
-
by
Padma Venkataraman, Rohini Lakshané, Sampada Nayak and Vidushi Marda
—
published
Jan 13, 2017
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
ICANN sought community input on the Proposed ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy on 7 November 2016. In response to this the Centre for Internet & Society (CIS) submitted its comments.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Navigating the 'Reconsideration' Quagmire (A Personal Journey of Acute Confusion)
-
by
Padmini Baruah and Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Nov 30, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
An earlier analysis of ICANN’s Documentary Information Disclosure Policy already brought to light our concerns about the lack of transparency in ICANN’s internal mechanisms. Carrying my research forward, I sought to arrive at an understanding of the mechanisms used to appeal a denial of DIDP requests. In this post, I aim to provide a brief account of my experiences with the Reconsideration Request process that ICANN provides for as a tool for appeal.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
'Delink ICANN from US jurisdiction'
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Nov 15, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
Eight Indian civil society organisations involved with internet governance have called for complete delinking of ICANN from US jurisdiction, saying an important global public infrastructure being subject to a single country’s control is unacceptable.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media
-
ICANN Begins its Sojourn into Open Data
-
by
Padmini Baruah and Sumandro Chattapadhyay
—
published
Nov 11, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 12, 2016 01:17 AM
—
filed under:
Open Data,
ICANN,
internet governance
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently announced that it will now set up a pilot project in order to introduce an Open Data initiative for all data that it generates. We would like to extend our congratulations to ICANN on the development of this commendable new initiative, and would be honoured to support the creation of this living document to be prepared before ICANN 58.
Located in
Internet Governance
-
How Workstream 2 Plans to Improve ICANN's Transparency
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Nov 10, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 11, 2016 10:05 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Internet Governance
The Centre for Internet and Society has worked extensively on ICANN’s transparency policies. We are perhaps the single largest users of the Documentary Information Disclosure Policy. Our goal in doing so is not to be a thorn in ICANN’s side, but to try and ensure that ICANN, the organisation, as well as the ICANN community have access to the data required to carry out the task of regulating the global domain name system.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Internet's Core Resources are a Global Public Good - They Cannot Remain Subject to One Country's Jurisdiction
-
by
Vidushi Marda
—
published
Nov 09, 2016
—
last modified
Nov 14, 2016 06:39 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
Homepage,
Internet Governance
This statement was issued by 8 India civil society organizations, supported by 2 key global networks, involved with internet governance issues, to the meeting of ICANN in Hyderabad, India from 3 to 9 November 2016. The Centre for Internet & Society was one of the 8 organizations that drafted this statement.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
ICANN 57
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Nov 08, 2016
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
ICANN,
IANA,
Internet Governance
ICANN 57 is being hosted by the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India from November 3 to 9, 2016 in Hyderabad at Hyderabad International Convention Centre. Vidushi Marda participated in the event as a speaker.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
News & Media