-
Limits to Privacy
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 11, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 14, 2012 10:28 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Privacy
In this chapter we attempt to build a catalogue of these various
justifications, without attempting to be exhaustive, with the objective of arriving at a
rough taxonomy of such frequently invoked terms. In addition we also examine some the
more important justifications such as “public interest” and “security of the state” that
have been invoked in statutes and upheld by courts to deprive persons of their privacy.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Publications
-
India Proposes Restrictions on Tapping Telephone Calls
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 26, 2011
—
last modified
May 06, 2011 05:53 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
An Indian government report has recommended that interception of telephone calls by government agencies should be limited to situations when there is a "public emergency" or "public safety" is at stake. John Riberio's article appeared in the PC World, TechWorld and CIO. Pranesh Prakash, program manager from the Centre for Internet and Society has been quoted in these articles.
Located in
News & Media
-
Consumers International World Congress - Day 3 roundup
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 05, 2011
—
last modified
May 06, 2011 05:34 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights
Consumers can be empowered, and consumer organisations can make sure this happens through sharing and networking, speakers at the 19th Consumers International World Congress in Hong Kong said. The programme of the Congress finished on Thursday evening, and on Friday the global consumer body will hold its General Assembly and Council elections. This news was published in the Consumer's International Blog on May 5, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
India Should Watch Its Internet Watchmen
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Mar 28, 2011
—
last modified
May 06, 2011 05:08 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
The month after terrorists attacked Mumbai in 2008, India's government initiated legislation enabling it to eavesdrop on electronic communication and block websites on grounds of national security. There was no public debate before the bill in question was introduced, and hardly any debate inside parliament itself before it passed in 2009. In the law, there were no guidelines about the extent to which an individual's right to privacy would be breached. And there was certainly no mention, and therefore, reassurance, that due process would be followed when it came to restricting access to websites. This article by Rahul Bhatia was published in the Wall Street Journal on March 28, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
New internet rules open to arbitrary interpretation
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 27, 2011
—
last modified
May 06, 2011 04:58 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
Six years after an e-commerce CEO's arrest for a pornographic CD sold from his website, the government has introduced a liability on intermediaries such as Facebook and Google to "act within 36 hours" of receiving information about offensive content. This article by Manoj Mitta & Javed Anwer was published in the Times of India on April 27, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
India's cyber cafes going porn-free
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Apr 28, 2011
—
last modified
May 06, 2011 04:53 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
Pornography fans in India who like to indulge in the sexual eye candy at public cyber cafes may be in for a forced intervention as a new government ruling bans porn websites, requires cafe owners to keep a one-year log of all sites accessed by customers and forces customers to produce an ID card prior to use. This news was published on msnbc.com on April 28, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
India Chills Online Speech
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 10, 2011
—
last modified
May 05, 2011 03:19 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
While most governments try to control online freedom of speech in a somewhat restrictive manner, either as a collaborator or as a regulator, rarely do they formulate a law to curb online speech. Rarer still does a government provide sweeping powers to intermediaries like an ISP and administrators of Internet sites to control content based on a long list of criteria. This news was published in 'digital communities' on May 3, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
Digerati See Censorship in New Web Rules
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 02, 2011
—
last modified
May 05, 2011 02:21 AM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance
Attention Indian bloggers and social media fiends: the next time you’re composing a witty tweet or posting an edgy item on Facebook, please take care that what you’re writing isn’t “grossly harmful” or “harassing” or “ethnically objectionable” or – oh, the humanity! – “disparaging.” This news was published in the Wall Street Journal on May 2, 2011.
Located in
News & Media
-
March 2011 Bulletin
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
last modified
May 03, 2011 07:19 AM
pdf
Located in
Publications (Automated)
-
Privacy By Design — Conference Report
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
May 02, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 22, 2011 12:03 PM
—
filed under:
Internet Governance,
Privacy
How do we imagine privacy? How is privacy being built into technological systems? On April 16th,The Center for Internet and Society hosted Privacy by Design, an Open Space meant to answer these questions and more around the topic of privacy. Below is a summary of the conversations and dialogs from the event.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
/
Privacy