-
CIS RTI REQUEST TO DIPP - NUMBER 3 - FEBRUARY, 2015
-
by
Nehaa Chaudhari
—
published
Apr 14, 2015
—
filed under:
Government Information,
Access to Knowledge,
DIPP,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Accountability,
NATIONAL IPR POLICY,
IPR THINK TANK
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
DIPP RESPONSE TO CIS (SECOND) RTI - FEBRUARY, 2015
-
by
Nehaa Chaudhari
—
published
Apr 14, 2015
—
filed under:
Government Information,
Access to Knowledge,
DIPP,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Accountability,
NATIONAL IPR POLICY,
IPR THINK TANK
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
The Digital Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Questions Raised by the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library in India
-
by
Sunil Abraham and Vidushi Marda
—
published
Dec 09, 2016
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Access to Knowledge
This is an edited version of part three of a study that considers the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) through aspects of intellectual property in India, namely, mobile patents, free and open source software, and India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library. Through these, it demonstrates the potential of the internet in realising ESCRs.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Comparison of National IPR Strategy September 2012, National IPR Strategy July 2014 and Draft National IP Policy, December 2014
-
by
Amulya Purushothama
—
published
Oct 15, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 08, 2016 01:49 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Patents,
Access to Knowledge
This is an analysis of the first draft of India's National IPR Policy with an earlier document "India's National IPR Strategy".
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
National IPR Policy Series: Quick Observations on the Leaked Draft of the National IPR Policy
-
by
Nehaa Chaudhari
—
published
Oct 18, 2015
—
last modified
Nov 19, 2015 05:13 AM
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies
Earlier this week, the “Don’t Trade Our Lives Away” blog leaked the supposed final draft of India’s National IPR Policy (“leaked draft”). This article presents quick comments on this leaked draft.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Pranesh Prakash: Influencing India's IP Laws
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Feb 25, 2014
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
Copyright,
Access to Knowledge
Pranesh Prakash believes intellectual property laws need to evolve and change with time.
Located in
News & Media
-
MHRD IPR Chair Series: Information Received from Tezpur University
-
by
Karan Tripathi
—
published
Apr 26, 2016
—
filed under:
Intellectual Property Rights,
RTI,
Access to Knowledge
This post provides a factual description about the operation of Ministry of Human Resource Development IPR Chair’s Intellectual Property Education, Research and Public Outreach (IPERPO) scheme in Tezpur University. The author has analysed all the data received under various heads such as income, grants from MHRD, planned and non planned expenditure, nature and frequency of programmes organised and the allocation of funds for the same.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Summary of CIS Comments to DIPP’s Discussion Paper on SEPs and their availability on FRAND terms
-
by
Anubha Sinha
—
published
Apr 26, 2016
—
last modified
Apr 26, 2016 12:07 PM
—
filed under:
DIPP,
Intellectual Property Rights,
FRAND,
Access to Knowledge
This blog post summarises CIS’ responses to DIPP’s Discussion Paper on SEPs and their availability on FRAND terms. The response made specific recommendations regarding adequacy of Indian law to determine SEP litigation, remedies for FRAND assured SEPs, FRAND royalty rates, SSO’s policies, parties’ non-disclosure agreements and transparency, and essentiality of SEPs and their declassification.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
CCI allowed to probe Ericsson: FAQs on Ericsson’s disputes with Micromax and Intex
-
by
Nehaa Chaudhari
—
published
Apr 30, 2016
—
last modified
May 01, 2016 01:46 PM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Pervasive Technologies,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Competition Law,
Patents
The blog post is an analysis of the recent decision of the Delhi High Court, clarifying that the Competition Commission of India could investigate Ericsson for a violation of competition law. A shorter version of this blog post was published in the Quint on April 30, 2016.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
Indian Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Discussion Paper on Standard Essential Patents
-
by
Nehaa Chaudhari
—
published
May 10, 2016
—
filed under:
DIPP,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Access to Knowledge
India’s Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (“DIPP”) released in March, earlier this year, a discussion paper on standard essential patents and their availability on fair, reasonable and non discriminatory terms.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
