-
Good Intentions, Recalcitrant Text – II: What India’s ITU Proposal May Mean for Internet Governance
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Nov 01, 2014
—
last modified
Nov 03, 2014 07:07 AM
—
filed under:
Multi-stakeholder,
ITU,
Internet Governance
The UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) is hosting its Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-14) this year in South Korea. At PP-14, India introduced a new draft resolution on ITU's Role in Realising Secure Information Society. The Draft Resolution has grave implications for human rights and Internet governance. Geetha Hariharan explores.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
An Evidence based Intermediary Liability Policy Framework: Workshop at IGF
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Jun 30, 2014
—
last modified
Jul 04, 2014 06:41 AM
—
filed under:
human rights,
Digital Governance,
internet governance,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance Forum,
Human Rights Online,
Intermediary Liability,
Policies,
Multi-stakeholder
CIS is organising a workshop at the Internet Governance Forum 2014. The workshop will be an opportunity to present and discuss ongoing research on the changing definition of intermediaries and their responsibilities across jurisdictions and technologies and contribute to a comprehensible framework for liability that is consistent with the capacity of the intermediary and with international human-rights standards.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
The 'Global Multistakholder Community' is Neither Global Nor Multistakeholder
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Oct 20, 2015
—
last modified
Nov 03, 2016 10:42 AM
—
filed under:
Multi-stakeholder,
ICANN,
IANA Transition,
Internet Governance
CIS research shows how Western, male, and industry-driven the IANA transition process actually is.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group Analysis
-
by
Jyoti Panday
—
published
Jul 31, 2015
—
last modified
Apr 12, 2016 10:02 AM
—
filed under:
Multi-stakeholder,
Internet Governance
This analysis has been done to see the trend in the selection and rotation of the members of the Multistakeholder advisory group (MAG) in the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). The MAG has been functional for nine years from 2006-2015. The analysis is based on data procured, collated and organised by Pranesh Prakash and Jyoti Panday. Shambhavi Singh, Law Student, NLU Delhi who was interning with CIS at the time also assisted with the organisation and analysis of the data.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
WSIS+10 High Level Event: A Bird's Eye Report
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Jun 20, 2014
—
last modified
Jun 20, 2014 03:57 PM
—
filed under:
WSIS+10,
Privacy,
Cybersecurity,
Human Rights Online,
Surveillance,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Facebook,
Data Protection,
Multi-stakeholder,
ICANN,
Internet Access,
ITU,
Internet Studies,
E-Governance,
ICT
The WSIS+10 High Level was organised by the ITU and collaborative UN entities on June 9-13, 2014. It aimed to evaluate the progress on implementation of WSIS Outcomes from Geneva 2003 and Tunis 2005, and to envision a post-2015 Development Agenda. Geetha Hariharan attended the event on CIS' behalf.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Good Intentions, Recalcitrant Text - I: Why India’s Proposal at the ITU is Troubling for Internet Freedoms
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Oct 28, 2014
—
last modified
Nov 02, 2014 03:13 PM
—
filed under:
Cryptography,
Privacy,
Cybersecurity,
Internet Governance,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Chilling Effect,
Multi-stakeholder,
Anonymity,
ITU
The UN's International Telecommunications Union (ITU) is hosting its Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-14) this year in South Korea. At PP-14, India introduced a new draft resolution on ITU's Role in Realising Secure Information Society. The Draft Resolution has grave implications for human rights and Internet governance. Geetha Hariharan explores.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
