-
DIDP Request #1: ICANN's Expenditures on "Travel & Meetings"
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Mar 05, 2015
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Transparency,
Accountability
CIS sent ICANN a request under its Documentary Information Disclosure Policy, seeking details of expenditure by ICANN at its Meetings. CIS' request and ICANN's response are detailed below.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #4: ICANN and the NETmundial Principles
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Mar 05, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 05, 2015 08:28 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Transparency,
Accountability
CIS sent ICANN a request under its Documentary Information Disclosure Policy, seeking details of ICANN's implementation of the NETmundial Principles that it has endorsed widely and publicly. CIS' request and ICANN's response are detailed below.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #6: Revenues from gTLD auctions
-
by
Geetha Hariharan
—
published
Mar 10, 2015
—
last modified
Mar 10, 2015 10:59 AM
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Transparency,
Accountability
CIS sent ICANN a request under its Documentary Information Disclosure Policy, seeking information regarding revenues received from gTLD auctions. CIS' request and ICANN's response are detailed below.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #13: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registries
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 28, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
On multiple occasions, Fadi Chehade, then President and CEO of ICANN has emphasized the importance of conducting audits (internal and external) to ensure compliance of ICANN’s contracted parties. At a US congressional hearing, he spoke about the contract monitoring function of ICANN.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #14: Keeping track of ICANN’s contracted parties: Registrars
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 28, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
In September 2016, we filed two separate DIDP requests regarding ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Goals.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #15: What is going on between Verisign and ICANN?
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
During a hearing of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on “Internet Governance Progress After ICANN 53,” President and CEO of ICANN - Mr Fadi Chehade indicated that ICANN follows up with registries and registrars on receipt of any complaint against them about violations of their contract with ICANN.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #16 - ICANN has no Documentation on Registrars’ “Abuse Contacts”
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
Registrars on contract with ICANN are required to maintain an “abuse contact” - a 24/7 dedicated phone line and e-mail address to receive reports of abuse regarding the registered names sponsored by the registrar.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #17 - How ICANN Chooses their Contractual Compliance Auditors
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
At a congressional hearing on internet governance and progress, then President of ICANN Fadi Chehadi indicated that the number of people working on compliance audits grew substantially—from 6 to 24 (we misquoted it as 25)— in the span of a few years.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #18 - ICANN’s Internal Website will Stay Internal
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
ICANN maintains an internal website accessible to staff and employees. We requested ICANN to provide us with a document with the contents of that website in the interest of transparency and accountability.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
DIDP Request #19 - ICANN’s role in the Postponement of the IANA Transition
-
by
Asvatha Babu
—
published
Jul 29, 2016
—
filed under:
ICANN,
DIDP,
Internet Governance
In March 2014, the National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) of the United States government announced plans to shift the Internet Assigned Names and Numbers (IANA) functions from ICANN to the global multistakeholder community. The initial deadline set for this was September 2015.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog