-
Facebook, Google tell India they won’t screen for derogatory content
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 07, 2011 05:25 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
In the world’s largest democracy, the government wants Internet sites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Google to screen and remove offensive content about religious figures and political leaders as soon as they learn about it. But those companies now say they can’t help.
-
FTN: Should social networking sites be censored?
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 08, 2011 05:32 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal met the representatives of Facebook, Google and others seeking to device a screening mechanism. Sunil Abraham was on CNN-IBN from 10.00 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. speaking about freedom of expression in India.
-
Govt wants to scrub the Internet clean
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
Web advocacy groups, experts say govt’s move to evolve content guidelines amounts to censorship. This article by Surabhi Agarwal & Leslie D’monte was published in Livemint on 7 December 2011. Sunil Abraham has been quoted in this article.
Located in
News & Media
-
Debate: Online content row-1
-
by
Prasad Krishna
—
published
Dec 07, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 07, 2011 11:06 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
In a debate moderated by TIMES NOW's Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, panelists Chandan Mitra, Editor-in-Chief, 'The Pioneer' & MP, BJP; Sabeer Bhatia, Co-founder, Hotmail; Sunil Abraham, Executive Director, Centre for Internet and Society; Ankit Fadia, Ethical Hacker; Suhel Seth, Managing Partner Counselage; Pradeep Gupta, Chairman, Cyber Media and Rajesh Charia, President, Internet Service Providers Association of India discuss the issue if the Government should make clear definition of what is objectionable to internet/social media companies and draw a clear distinction between communally incitable material and political censorship.
Located in
News & Media
-
India’s dreams of web censorship
-
by
Sunil Abraham
—
published
Dec 06, 2011
—
last modified
Mar 26, 2012 06:59 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance
If you are offended by this post, please contact Kapil Sibal, India’s telecoms and IT minister, and he will make sure it is promptly taken down.
-
Comment by CIS at ACE on Presentation on French Charter on the Fight against Cyber-Counterfeiting
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Dec 01, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 01, 2011 11:59 AM
—
filed under:
Access to Knowledge,
Copyright,
Privacy,
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Intellectual Property Rights,
Piracy,
Censorship,
WIPO
The seventh session of the World Intellectual Property Organization's Advisory Committee on Enforcement is being held in Geneva on November 30 and December 1, 2011. Pranesh Prakash responded to a presentation by Prof. Pierre Sirinelli of the École de droit de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 on 'The French Charter on the Fight against Cyber-Counterfeiting of December 16, 2009' with this comment.
Located in
Access to Knowledge
/
Blogs
-
The Present — and Future — Dangers of India's Draconian New Internet Regulations
-
by
Anja Kovacs
—
published
May 31, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:22 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
The uproar surrounding India's Internet Control Rules makes clear that in the Internet age, as before, the active chilling of freedom of expression by the state is unacceptable in a democracy. Yet if India's old censorship regimes are to be maintained in this new context, the state will have little choice but to do just that. Are we ready to rethink the ways in which we deal with free speech and censorship as a society? Asks Anja Kovacs in this article, published in Caravan, 1 June 2011.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
Rebuttal of DIT's Misleading Statements on New Internet Rules
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
May 13, 2011
—
last modified
Jul 11, 2012 01:18 PM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
Featured,
Intermediary Liability
The press statement issued on May 11 by the Department of Information Technology (DIT) on the furore over the newly-issued rules on 'intermediary due diligence' is misleading and is, in places, plainly false. We are presenting a point-by-point rebuttal of the DIT's claims.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
You Have the Right to Remain Silent
-
by
Anja Kovacs
—
published
Apr 19, 2011
—
last modified
Aug 02, 2011 07:55 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
human rights,
Internet Governance,
Censorship
India has a long history of censorship that it justifies in the name of national security. But new laws governing the Internet are unreasonable and — given the multitude of online voices — poorly thought out, argues Anja Kovacs in this article published in the Sunday Guardian on 17 April 2011.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog
-
RTI Applications on Blocking of Websites
-
by
Pranesh Prakash
—
published
Mar 08, 2011
—
last modified
Dec 21, 2012 06:34 AM
—
filed under:
Freedom of Speech and Expression,
IT Act,
RTI,
Public Accountability
In recent weeks, an increasing number of incidents have come to light on government-ordered blocking of websites. In one case involving Zone-H.org, it is clear who has ordered the block (a Delhi district court judge, as an interim order), even though the block itself is open to constitutional challenge. In all others cases, including the TypePad case, it is unclear who has ordered the block and why. We at CIS have sent in two right to information requests to find out.
Located in
Internet Governance
/
Blog