Publications

by kaeru — last modified Aug 23, 2011 10:57 PM
Latest Access to Knowledge (A2K) publications
Intellectual Property Rights — Open Access for Researchers

Intellectual Property Rights — Open Access for Researchers

In the year 2013, Nehaa Chaudhari had worked on a module on Intellectual Property Rights for United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)'s Open Access Curriculum (Curriculum for Researchers) as part of a project for the Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia. UNESCO published the module this year. Nehaa Chaudhari and Varun Baliga were among the Module preparation team. Nehaa Chaudhari was the writer for Units 1, 2 and 3: Understanding Intellectual Property Rights, Copyright and Alternative to a Strict Copyright Regime.

Intellectual Property Rights — Open Access for Researchers - Read More…

Pervasive Technologies: Patent Pools

In this research paper, Nehaa Chaudhari gives an analysis of patent pools. She discusses the working of a patent pool, study patent pool in other areas of technology, and patenting in telecom and related technology.

Pervasive Technologies: Patent Pools - Read More…

Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010

CIS analyses the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, from a public interest perspective to sift the good from the bad, and importantly to point out what crucial amendments should be considered but have not been so far.

Analysis of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010 - Read More…

A Guide to Key IPR Provisions of the Proposed India-European Union Free Trade Agreement

The Centre for Internet and Society presents a guide for policymakers and other stakeholders to the latest draft of the India-European Union Free Trade Agreement, which likely will be concluded by the end of the year and may hold serious ramifications for Indian businesses and consumers.

A Guide to Key IPR Provisions of the Proposed India-European Union Free Trade Agreement - Read More…

The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill

Pranesh Prakash examines the numerous flaws in the Special 301 from the Indian perspective, to come to the conclusion that the Indian government should openly refuse to acknowledge such a flawed report. He notes that the Consumers International survey, to which CIS contributed the India report, serves as an effective counter to the Special 301 report.

The 2010 Special 301 Report Is More of the Same, Slightly Less Shrill - Read More…

Technological Protection Measures in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010

In this post Pranesh Prakash conducts a legal exegesis of section 65A of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010, which deals with the stuff that enables 'Digital Rights/Restrictions Management', i.e., Technological Protection Measures. He notes that while the provision avoids some mistakes of the American law, it still poses grave problems to consumers, and that there are many uncertainties in it still.

Technological Protection Measures in the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010 - Read More…

Arguments Against Software Patents in India

CIS believes that software patents are harmful for the software industry and for consumers. In this post, Pranesh Prakash looks at the philosophical, legal and practical reasons for holding such a position in India. This is a slightly modified version of a presentation made by Pranesh Prakash at the iTechLaw conference in Bangalore on February 5, 2010, as part of a panel discussing software patents in India, the United States, and the European Union.

Arguments Against Software Patents in India - Read More…

Arguments Against the PUPFIP Bill

The Protection and Utilisation of Public Funded Intellectual Property Bill (PUPFIP Bill) is a new legislation being considered by Parliament, which was introduced in the 2008 winter session of the Rajya Sabha. It is modelled on the American Bayh-Dole Act (University and Small Business Patent Procedures Act) of 1980. On this page, we explore some of the reasons that the bill is unnecessary, and how it will be harmful if passed.

Arguments Against the PUPFIP Bill - Read More…

Document Actions