Internet Governance Blog

by admin last modified Apr 05, 2016 03:40 AM

Policy Brief on the Report of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on ICT

by Elonnai Hickok and Vipul Kharbanda — last modified Aug 23, 2016 03:37 PM
August 23, 2016
ICT

In light of the complex challenges and threats posed to, and by, the field of information telecommunications in cyberspace, in 1998 the draft resolution in the First Committee of the UN General Assembly was introduced and adopted without a vote (A/RES/53/70) ]. Since then, the Secretary General to the General Assembly has invited annual reports on the issue.

Policy Brief on the Report of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on ICT - Read More…

Book Review: Apocalypse Now Redux

by Nishant Shah — last modified Aug 06, 2016 04:16 AM
August 06, 2016

My review for Arundhati Roy and John Cusack's new book that captures their encounter with Edward Snowden, 'Things that can and cannot be said' is now out. It's an engaging, if somewhat freewheeling, political critique of the times we live in.

Book Review: Apocalypse Now Redux - Read More…

Analysis of the Report of the Group of Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security and Implications for India

by Elonnai Hickok and Vipul Kharbanda — last modified Aug 11, 2016 09:58 AM

This paper analyses the report of the Group of Experts and and India’s compliance with its recommendations based on existing laws and policies. Given the global nature of these challenges and the need for nations to holistically address such challenges from a human rights and security perspective, CIS believes that the Group of Experts and similar international forums are useful and important forums for India to actively engage with.

Analysis of the Report of the Group of Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security and Implications for India - Read More…

DIDP Request #28 - ICANN renews Verisign’s RZM Contract?

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 08:10 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

Our request to ICANN was related to our (mistaken) assumption that Verisign and ICANN had signed an agreement for Root Zone Maintenance and had recently renewed it. In that context we had asked for information such as documents reflecting the decision making process, copy of the current RZM agreement, public comments and an audit report of Verisign’s RZM functions.

DIDP Request #28 - ICANN renews Verisign’s RZM Contract? - Read More…

DIDP Request #27 - On ICANN’s support to new gTLD Applicants

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 08:03 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

In order to promote access to the New gTLD Program in developing regions, ICANN set up the New gTLD Applicant Support Program (Program) which seeks to facilitate cooperation between gTLD applicants from developing countries and those willing and able to support them financially (and in kind).

DIDP Request #27 - On ICANN’s support to new gTLD Applicants - Read More…

DIDP Request #25 - Curbing Sexual Harassment at ICANN

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 06:14 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

Markus Kummer at Public Forum 2 mentioned that ICANN has standards of behavior regarding sexual harassment that are applicable for its staff.

DIDP Request #25 - Curbing Sexual Harassment at ICANN - Read More…

DIDP Request #23 - ICANN does not Know how Diverse its Comment Section Is

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 05:55 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

While researching ICANN and the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG), we came across a diversity analysis report of a public comment section.

DIDP Request #23 - ICANN does not Know how Diverse its Comment Section Is - Read More…

DIDP Request #22 - Reconsideration Requests from Parties affected by ICANN Action

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 03:52 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

According to ICANN by-laws, ICANN has the responsibility to answer to reconsideration requests filed by those directly affected by its actions.

DIDP Request #22 - Reconsideration Requests from Parties affected by ICANN Action - Read More…

DIDP Request #21 - ICANN’s Relationship with the RIRs

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 03:42 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

At CIS, we wanted a clearer understanding of ICANN’s relationship with the 5 internet registries. The large amount contributed by the RIRs to ICANN’s funding lead us to question the nature of this relationship as well as the payment. We wrote to ICANN asking them for these details.

DIDP Request #21 - ICANN’s Relationship with the RIRs - Read More…

DIDP Request #20 - Is Presumptive Renewal of Verisign’s Contracts a Good Thing?

by Asvatha Babu — last modified Jul 30, 2016 02:01 AM
July 30, 2016
DIDP,

ICANN’s contract agreements with different registries contain a presumptive renewal clause. Unless they voluntarily give up their rights or there is a material breach by the registry operator, their contract with ICANN will be automatically renewed.

DIDP Request #20 - Is Presumptive Renewal of Verisign’s Contracts a Good Thing? - Read More…

Document Actions