Internet Governance Blog

by admin last modified Apr 05, 2016 03:40 AM

Comments on the Proposed Rule 138A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 Concerning Radio Frequency Identification Tags

by Bhairav Acharya — last modified Dec 04, 2012 03:32 PM
December 04, 2012

The Centre for Internet & Society gave its comments on the proposed Rule 138A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The comments were made in response to Notification GSR 738(E) published in the Gazette of India on October 3, 2012.

Comments on the Proposed Rule 138A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 Concerning Radio Frequency Identification Tags - Read More…

Section 66-A, Information Technology Act, 2000: Cases

by Snehashish Ghosh — last modified Dec 06, 2012 09:20 AM

In this blog post Snehashish Ghosh summarizes the facts of a few cases where Section 66-A, Information Technology Act, 2000, has been mentioned or discussed.

Section 66-A, Information Technology Act, 2000: Cases - Read More…

Transcripts from WCIT-12

by Snehashish Ghosh — last modified Dec 03, 2012 02:00 PM
December 03, 2012

We are archiving copies of the live-transcripts from the World Conference on International Telecommunications, 2012 (WCIT-12) which is being held in Dubai from 3–14 December, 2012.

Transcripts from WCIT-12 - Read More…

So Much to Lose

So Much to Lose

by Nishant Shah — last modified Dec 07, 2012 04:39 PM

Unless you have been hiding under a rock, you have been a witness to the maelstrom of events that accompanied the death of the political leader Bal Thackeray.

So Much to Lose - Read More…

Fixing India’s anarchic IT Act

Fixing India’s anarchic IT Act

by Pranesh Prakash — last modified Nov 30, 2012 06:33 AM

Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act criminalizes “causing annoyance or inconvenience” online, among other things. A conviction for such an offence can attract a prison sentence of as many as three years.

Fixing India’s anarchic IT Act - Read More…

Breaking Down Section 66A of the IT Act

by Pranesh Prakash — last modified Dec 14, 2012 09:51 AM

Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, which prescribes 'punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.' is widely held by lawyers and legal academics to be unconstitutional. In this post Pranesh Prakash explores why that section is unconstitutional, how it came to be, the state of the law elsewhere, and how we can move forward.

Breaking Down Section 66A of the IT Act - Read More…

Draft nonsense

Draft nonsense

by Pranesh Prakash — last modified Dec 03, 2012 09:08 AM

Seriously flawed and dodgily drafted provisions in the IT Act provide the state a stick to beat its citizens with.

Draft nonsense - Read More…

DoT Blocks Domain Sites — But Reasons and Authority Unclear

by Smitha Krishna Prasad — last modified Nov 21, 2012 10:03 AM

Earlier this year, ISPs such as Airtel and MTNL blocked a number of domain sites including BuyDomains, Fabulous Domains and Sedo.co.uk. Whereas the Indian Government and courts have previously issued orders blocking websites, these actions have generally been attributed to issues such as posting of inflammatory content or piracy of copyrighted material. However, the reasoning behind blocking domain marketplaces such as the above mentioned sites is not clear.

DoT Blocks Domain Sites — But Reasons and Authority Unclear - Read More…

Will The International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs) Impact Internet Governance? A Multistakeholder Perspective

by Pranesh Prakash — last modified Dec 10, 2012 04:40 AM
December 06, 2012
ITU,

Pranesh Prakash made a presentation at the India Internet Governance Conference (IIGC) held at the FICCI, Federation House, Tansen Marg, New Delhi on October 4 and 5, 2012. The event was organised by the Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, FICCI and Internet Society. CIS was one of the supporting organisations.

Will The International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs) Impact Internet Governance? A Multistakeholder Perspective - Read More…

Statement of Civil Society Members and Groups Participating in the "Best Bits" pre-IGF meeting at Baku in 2012

by Pranesh Prakash — last modified Dec 07, 2012 08:06 AM
December 06, 2012
WCIT,
ITU,

The Centre for Internet & Society was one of the signatories for this submission made to the ITU on November 16, 2012.

Statement of Civil Society Members and Groups Participating in the "Best Bits" pre-IGF meeting at Baku in 2012 - Read More…

Document Actions

() [] {} 