WIPO SCCR 24 Post-lunch Text (July 24, 2012)

by Prasad Krishna last modified Jul 31, 2012 12:13 PM
This is an unedited rough transcript of the discussions at SCCR 24, which was live-streamed and made available by WIPO.

Plain Text icon 2012-07-24_sccr24_post-lunch.txt — Plain Text, 19 kB (19,591 bytes)

File contents

World Intellectual Property Organization meeting.
Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights.
Session 24.
24 July 2012.
15 :00.
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.)
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.).
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.).
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.).
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.).
(please stand by. The meeting will begin momentarily.)
>> CHAIR: Colleagues, good afternoon. Welcome back to our plenary session.
We continue with the agenda item on broadcasting. I would want to report that the informal consultations that were held following the release of the Chair's nonpaper led to a number of changes to the document from those delegations that had wanted, or held the view that some of their proposals were not reflected in the Chair's nonpaper.
So effectively, their document in the informals went through what I call substantial transformation.
What we have before you now is a document that has been revised. Now, during the informal discussions, the idea was to try and incorporate as much as possible the proposals that those delegations felt strongly should be in the document.
And I must report that the Chair gave all opportunity possible for delegations to make those inclusions, and all the inclusions were made.
That has led to the current status of the document. Now, the issue is that we now have a single text to consider in this Committee.
The question is that we should get to a stage where we do agree that this would be the basis of our work going forward, with the understanding of course that it remains as all other working documents, a open document for negotiation in the Committee.
Members that may have of course textual proposals to negotiate upon are always free to do so, as is the case with all other working documents.
So the question that I would want this Committee to consider now is that we adopt this document as a working document for the Committee on this agenda item. And then we can move the next step to start negotiating on the provisions therein.
So this is a question for the Committee. Egypt.
>> EGYPT: Thank you, Chair. The African Group comendz the Chair, the Secretariat and all the Member States for the hard work in producing the nonpaper on broadcasting. This may not be the perfect, a perfect document but in the interest of the work going forward, we are willing as the African Group to use this document as the basis for future work on the issue.
The African Group would support that the Chair's nonpaper be adopted as the Committee's working document, to guide our future deliberations on broadcasting.
It's our further recommendation that this Committee makes a clear recommendation to the General Assembly on our plan towards hosting a Diplomatic Conference on broadcasting in 2014. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Thank you, Egypt. Iran.
>> ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My delegation would appreciate your effort, and also Secretariat in preparing this paper. And my delegation supports the usage to adopt this document as a working document as a base for the future negotiations. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
>> CHAIR: Thank you. Any further comments? India.
>> INDIA: Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Indian delegation appreciates your work and especially the work of the WIPO Secretariat bringing all this document, but this document is not a complete document.
It looks like a OPEC document, if someone carefully reads it, one article is totally against the other articles, language, especially this is not as per the 2007 mandate, signal bridge approach in traditional sense. Moreover, even though Indian comments are included in this document at the footnote, we have no problem for that, but Indian comments were given basically on these African and Mexican joint proposal, not on the Japanese proposal.
So we don't have a mandate from our capital to go ahead like this, because this document contains most of the ingredients from the Japanese proposal on which we are not examined at the capital. We don't have capital's approval on how to go ahead on those articles which have been put in alternatives.
Unfortunately, we are not in the position to support this document as a working document of the SCCR. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Thank you. South Africa.
>> SOUTH AFRICA: Thank you very much, Chair. We equally want to share the statement expressed by the delegation of Egypt on behalf of the African Group.
We should thank you very much, the Chair, and all the Member States that have contributed to the formulation of this document.
We understand that it's not a perfect document, because a lot of issues were put in, but we feel as a delegation that in the interest of accelerating our work on this matter, we can work on it.
Just to share with you, Chair, I had a discussion with one interesting delegation from Japan, who said to me that when the issue of broadcasting was discussed for the first time, he had no child. Now he has got a boy who is 13 years since. Now, my fear is if we don't accelerate our discussion, this 13-year-old will come and discuss this treaty that we are talking about today. Therefore, I think in the interest of accelerating our discussion, we can use this document as a basis to drive our work on a single text.
I think on that basis, my delegation supports that we take this document as a basis on which we can commence with our discussion, and equally with the statement expressed by the delegation of Egypt that we have a clear work plan, that can accelerate our discussions so as to have a Diplomatic Conference in 2014.
I thank you, Chair.
>> CHAIR: Thank you. Mexico.
>> MEXICO: Thank you, Chairman. We would like to say that we fully agree that the document that you were kind enough to put together and that you have done in a very detailed and concise precise manner, including many concerns of the various delegations, it's a good basis we think to move forward with our work, and to adopt eventually on broadcasting.
I think that we should acknowledge the hard work from the Chair, the Secretariat, and all of the countries who in a direct or indirect manner have played their role in putting together this document.
I thank you, Chairman.
>> CHAIR: Senegal and Peru.
>> Senegal: Thank you Chairman. I do thank you for giving me the floor.
My delegation has asked for the floor because we would like to associate ourselves with the statement made by Egypt, speaking on behalf of the African Group.
We also believe that we should adopt this document as a working document. We all know that this document is the result of considerable work done by the Chair, Friends of the Chair, and the Secretariat.
We therefore believe that it is imperative for us to have a working document on the basis of which we can work in future, and we have to recognize given all the work that has gone into this, that this document could be such a basis.
We also need to have a clear defined work plan for our future activities on this issue. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Peru followed by the U.S
>> Peru: Thank you, Chairman. On behalf of Peru, we would like to thank the Chairman for the work carried out in drafting this document, and in having provided us with a time and space to include the initiatives and comments of the various delegations and have their texts and comments included and reflected in the document, including those from GRULAC.
So Peru supports this document being adopted as a working document to move forward in this area. I thank you.
>> CHAIR: U.S.
>> UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The United States wants to thank you and the Secretariat for your hard work in turning this document around so quickly, and also to say how much we appreciate the flexibility of the proponents of the various proposals that went into it.
We do think that as it stands, it represents a very inclusive document. It is our understanding from all the discussions that preceded that the document remains completely open for further proposals for additional additions, dleetions or -- deletions or changes as the discussions progress, and the United States will certainly have some such proposals.
We agree that it reflects some very different and in some cases quite inconsistent approaches to a number of the issues of scope of protection. And I would say that we in the U.S. don't yet have authorization to agree to any of the particular options reflected in the text as of this time.
But we do think that it can serve as a working document, as a basis for further negotiations on the conditions that I've just mentioned. Thank you very much.
>> CHAIR: Thank you, U.S.
EU, to be followed by Algeria.
>> EUROPEAN UNION: Thank you, Mr. Chair. On behalf of the EU I would also like to thank you for the work and effort put into preparing this document over the weekend and later in the beginning of this week.
We are very happy that there was a way to put both main proposals, the South African and Mexican and Japanese proposals into the text.
The EU is prepared to work on this document. I should say that we still, we don't have a clear position from our Member States because we didn't have time to discuss it with our Member States.
But as EU, we can certainly say that we support working on this document on the basis, but it is a open document, which is open to changes, to additions, because we will have as we already mentioned in the meetings before, but we will have such comments, and we will have additions.
But we would like to show flexibility, and support this document as a working document. Thank you very much.
>> CHAIR: Algeria, then Nigeria.
>> ALGERIA: Thank you very much, Chairman.
Chairman, I'm speaking because I would like to associate myself with the statement made by Egypt, speaking on behalf of the African Group.
I would also like to say that as others have pointed out, in the past, my delegation was strongly in favor of having a single document in order to allow us to make headway on the issue of the protection for broadcasting organisations.
That being so, we are more than ready to work on the basis that has been now submitted, on the basis of the document now submitted to us.
We know that three documents submitted proposals, and I can tell you that there is indeed some room for further improvement of this document, bearing in mind all of those proposals and we think it is a very good basis for the future work of this Committee. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Nigeria, to be followed by Japan.
>> NIGERIA: Thank you, Chair. Nigeria associates with Egypt, to appreciate the massive work done by you and the Secretariat in producing this working document. For the broadcast organisation instrument. Nigeria supports the use of this document as a working document for deliberations, in order not to waste further time in concluding work on this treaty.
Considering the fact that a lot of time has been spent on putting this document in place.
Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Japan to be followed by Zambia.
>> JAPAN: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Firstly I would like to thank you for the effort in making this text. And we understand the concern expressed by distinguished delegates of India.
And I would like to equal the statement made by United States on the point that this working document should be open to further contribution or comment.
And during the informal consultation which we discussed how to develop this text, we recognized the difficulty of developing text with having alternatives on main substantive issue, especially definitions which related to other provisions.
So I would like to emphasize the importance of solving the basic substantive issue, mainly application and definitions before developing that detail of the text.
But we would like to, we look forward to making progress towards the treaty as soon as possible. But at the same time, it should be with the consensus of SCCR. So we are flexible, we keep the flexible manner. And we would like to contribute collectively to the further discussion. Thank you -- constructively to the further discussion. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Zambia followed by Kenya.
>> ZAMBIA: Thank you, Chair. The Zambian delegation associates itself with the delegation of Egypt on behalf of the kf an group -- African Group. The Chair and Secretariat have done a comendzable work by putting up this nonpaper.
During the informal meetings I noted that there was always a spirit of give and take in order to make progress. Thus that is why we have come up with this document.
The Zambian delegation therefore feels that this document be adopted as a working document to achieve progress. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Kenya, followed by Turkey.
>> KENYA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wish to take this opportunity to thank the Chair together with the Secretariat and all those delegates who were involved in the task of coming up with this document.
My delegation wishes to also associate itself with the submissions made by Egypt on behalf of the African Group. My delegation supports this document be used as a working document of the Committee, and once again calls for a collaborative spirit through which we can be able to engage ourselves in constructive negotiations or discussions.
It is also our hope that a work plan can be developed to drive this process forward. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Turkey, then Monaco.
>> TURKEY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. On behalf of Turkish delegation we would like to thank you and all distinguished delegation for the diligent work they have done so far.
We believe that Chair's nonpaper provides the basis for future work. We, therefore, propose that this document be adopted as the official working paper for the SCCR. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Monaco, then Switzerland.
>> Monaco: Thank you, Chairman. On behalf of the delegation of Monaco I'd like to begin, Chairman, by thanking you for all of the efforts that you have made in getting us to where we are. I know you have certainly not spared any efforts in seeking to produce this single text for us.
It's an excellent basis for our future work, we believe. Of course, we have to bear in mind that it is a evolving text, and that we reserve our right to come back with further comments on it at a later stage. But at this stage, we can support the text.
Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Switzerland, then Ecuador.
>> SWITZERLAND: Thank you, Chairman. And thank you for your document.
Our delegation like others who have already spoken would like to say that we accept this document, the document that emerged from yesterday's consultations following the discussion on the nonpaper, we accept this document as a document that should now be adopted as a working paper for the basis of future work within this Committee, and as the basis for future negotiations.
Clearly, this document will continue to evolve as we move forward. And we will reflect progress in the negotiations at future sessions of our Committee.
We also believe that it would be appropriate to discuss a work plan in order to ensure that we can achieve results on this issue in the near future.
Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Ecuador.
>> ECUADOR: Thank you, Chairman. Ecuador firstly would like to thank you for the work you have carried out and the Secretariat on this document. Ecuador would like to say the objective of this document achieved broadcasting rights and focus on the protection of the signal of radio broadcasters in their traditional sense, and is not included in the right holders, without prejudice to this Ecuador is flexible and will adopt this text as a working document, with the understanding that it is a open work in progress, and a open document. It is very important that this instrument includes provisions that assure in a modern way that all stakeholders' interests are guaranteed. We will provide contributions to comment on this document with this in mind. I thank you.
>> CHAIR: Indonesia.
>> INDONESIA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Indonesia would like to express appreciation to the Chair and Secretariat for the hard work to produce this document. We support the document as the working documents and hopefully other documents would follow.
We are of the view that a document like in this format could accelerate the progress and move forward of the negotiation on this matter. Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Thank you. Any further comments. India?
>> INDIA: I think the position of India is similar to what we are experiencing in the TBA final additional document. Also we were alone, just like famous noble laureate of Internet so we are to work alone in in matter because I will give some explanations why we are against adopting this document as a working paper of this SCCR.
If we look at the conclusions of the Twenty-Third SCCR, it has been expressly mentioned, under the heading of protection of broadcasting organisations, the Committee reaffirmed its commitment to continue work on a signal-based approach, consistent with the 2007 General Assembly mandate towards developing a international treaty to update the protection of broadcasting and cablecasting organisations in the traditional sense.
So this document is not in that spirit. As already mentioned to you, Mr. Chair, and to this August house that there are articles which are very contradictory in nature.
When we take a document in the traditional sense and signal-based approach, alternatives at least one of the alternatives should support this stand, this spirits. None of the alternatives are in the same spirit. Either you take alternatively A, alternative B, alternative C. So how can we treat this document as a document which is in the General Assembly's mandate, signal based approach in the traditional sense?
I just would like to mention the contradictory things mentioned. Start from the very article mentioned, article pertaining to the definitions. Look at the definition of the alternatives given, alternative B. Alternative B is talking about the definition of the broadcasting and cablecasting.
It is mentioning that it is understood that including transmission over computer network is not the spirit of this treaty.
If you move forward, whether it is a scope or beneficiaries or the protection of the organisation, which are the major articles, none of the articles in this spirit, at least one alternative should be in this spirit. It is not there.
Moreover, I would like to point out other, preamble is the heart and soul of any treaty. There is no preamble for this.
So without preamble, how can we adopt a document, and then when the, when article is totally against the article, how, we are not able to understand.
And moreover, there are new elements in this. We need to go back. We don't have a clearance from the capital to, we have a lot of discomfort. Of course, we are very sorry, we don't want to stall, because we attended television channels looking towards us that they want a treaty. But unfortunately, without a perfect document, we cannot adopt such a imperfect document which is not according to the 2007 mandate.
Thank you.
>> CHAIR: Colleagues, I have noted all the comments that have been made. And I note that there is overwhelming support to adopt this document as a working document of the Committee.
But we also note the statements that has been made by the delegation of India.
I propose at this stage that we move into informal consultation in the usual format, on this issue, as well as on the future work of the Committee on this agenda item.
So we have a room? We will move toockten haggen room, immediately.
Plenary is adjourned

Filed under: ,