Election panel rejects Google’s proposal for electoral services tie-up
Chief election commissioner V. S. Sampath. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint
The article by Anuja and Moulishree Srivastava was published in Livemint on January 9, 2014. Lawrence Liang is quoted.
The Election Commission (EC) on Thursday rejected a proposal by Internet search engine operator Google Inc. to provide electoral information services to EC ahead of the general election due later this year. Google’s proposal, made earlier this week, was criticized by experts and political parties on the grounds of security.
Google, which deals with Internet-related services and products, had made a presentation at EC where it proposed to deliver voter facilitation services through a tie-up with the Commission.
“Google made a presentation to the Commission for electoral hook up services for citizens to help in efforts of the Commission for better electoral information services. However, after due consideration, the Commission has decided not to pursue the proposal any further,” EC said in a statement.
Its decision came at a meeting of senior EC officials on Thursday, called to discuss the proposal. Security was one of the main issues before it.
“Security and controlling the data were the main points which were considered. By ways of such a tie-up all the data would have been up for access. It was always a question of whether Indian laws would apply to it or not, so we decided against it,” a senior official from EC said.
PTI reported that the meeting was attended by the chief election commissioner V.S. Sampath and election commissioners H.S. Brahma and S. N. A. Zaidi.
The Times of India in a report on Sunday said there were concerns over the EC move to tie up with Google for voter registration.
EC had earlier signed a non-disclosure agreement with Google but it had not shared any data with it. The move was criticised by the ruling Congress party as well as the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party. The legal cell of the Congress had written to EC raising concerns over national security and asking whether the tie-up would affect the electoral process. The BJP’s complaint was that stakeholders, including political parties, should have been consulted.
Experts say that in the event of such a tie-up, concerns about protection of privacy would have outweighed national security fears.
“The concern is not so much about national security as it is about privacy issues. This kind of database is too important and too powerful to be controlled by a private company. There have been too many instances of this kind of data being skewed and riots happening during the election process. Privately owned databases could lead to potential misuse of the data,” said Lawrence Liang, co-founder of Alternative Law Forum and chairman of the board at the Bangalore-based Centre for Internet and Society.
“It is not a question of how and what service Google could have provided for elections, but how the state can bring itself to provide that kind of service,” he said.
In the US, when George W. Bush was re-elected president in 2004, the company that manufactured the voting machines was accused of rigging the polls, Liang added.
Google called the EC’s rejection “unfortunate”, pointing out that the company has already helped governments with such services in countries like the Philippines, Egypt, Mexico and Kenya.
“It is unfortunate that our discussions with the Election Commission of India to change the way users access their electoral information, that is publicly available, through an online voter look up tool, were not fruitful,” Google said in a statement.
“Google will continue to develop tools and resources to make civic information universally accessible and useful, help drive more informed citizen participation, and open up new avenues for engagement for politicians, citizens, and civic leaders,” it added.
